<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>izit.com &#187; search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://izit.com/tag/search-engines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://izit.com</link>
	<description>internet. technology. business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Politics and Search Results</title>
		<link>http://izit.com/google-politics-and-search-results</link>
		<comments>http://izit.com/google-politics-and-search-results#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.izit.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call me a cynic but I have long suspected Google employees made sure their politically favorite Websites received better placement in their search results then their counterparts. Google CEO, Eric E. Schmidt, is such a political animal that he is more interested in joining the Obama team then in working to grow Google. Most likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px;" title="Google CEO Eric Schmidt" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/64/Eric_E_Schmidt%2C_2005_%28looking_left%29.jpg/225px-Eric_E_Schmidt%2C_2005_%28looking_left%29.jpg" alt="" width="179" height="269" />Call me a cynic but I have long suspected Google employees made sure their politically favorite Websites received better placement in their search results then their counterparts.</p>
<p>Google CEO, Eric E. Schmidt, is such a political animal that he is more interested in joining the <a title="Google CEO plays politics" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10070972-16.html">Obama team</a> then in working to grow Google. Most likely the political leanings of the Google staff as a whole is more like that of it&#8217;s CEO then that of a random slice taken from the general population. To think that this bias doesn&#8217;t play a role in the split second decisions that human editors at Google are faced with all day every day is to be naive.</p>
<p>A recent article in <a title="The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/" target="_blank">The Register</a> out of the UK, <a title="Google Politics" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12/12/googlewashing_revisited/" target="_blank">Google cranks up the Consensus Engine</a>,  included this commentary &#8220;<em>Make no mistake, Google is moving into new territory: not only making arbitrary, editorial choices &#8211; really no different to Fox News, say, or any other media organization. It&#8217;s now in the business of validating and manufacturing consent: not only reporting what people say, but how you should think</em>.&#8221; As the article states this is no small thing. A Google that filters the internet with bias of any kind is a Google that has no business being used for search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://izit.com/google-politics-and-search-results/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

